|Problem-solving prompt||Your response||Response example|
|Problem or risk||
resurgence of previous undesired behaviors, or the occurrence of novel undesired behaviors.
|If the client’s behavior is escape-maintained, denying the bathroom breaks could lead to an extinction burst, extinction-induced aggression, and emotional behavior.|
|Relevant ethical codes||
2.09 and 5.03
|3.01 Behavior analytic assessment – Some variation of a functional analysis should be conducted at the job site prior to making treatment recommendations
4.04 Approving behavior-change programs – An escape extinction procedure is not part of the current plan
4.05 Describing behavior-change program objectives – A risk-benefit analysis was never disclosed because the plan changed abruptly
4.09 Least restrictive procedures – Escape extinction is a highly restrictive procedure for an environment such as a job placement, which is low-restrictiveness
using DRA in addition to escape extinction or avoiding the use of escape extinction all together.
|To stay ethical and effective, Carol will need to make some quick decisions and give the problem the attention it requires. Carol can visit and make a definitive determination regarding the function. If it is escape, she might consider ways in which the job tasks could be more engaging for the client, such as providing continuous arbitrary reinforcement (headphones), NCR for escape (scheduled breaks), and contingency-based progressive delay to create greater temporal distance between requests to use the bathroom.|